Kyrsten Sinema

(Tribune file photo)

Whoever said that “presidential politics is two thirds theater” and that the White House is a grand stage should have taken a closer look at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. 

There, on Capitol Hill, sits an institution called the “world’s greatest deliberative body” by some and the “world’s most exclusive club” by others.

You know it best by its proper name: The United States Senate.

Among the 100 who serve are more than a handful who readily embrace the spectacle, pomp and prestige that comes with the title of “Senator.”

The late Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia often spoke of the Senate as if he had confused both time and place. That was not due to diminished cognitive skills, though his Senate service spanned more than a half century and concluded with his death in 2010. Instead, it was due to his inflated sense of status about both the institution and his own reputation there.

Byrd would employ his photographic memory and excessive sense of self-worth to recount episodes of political antiquity from the Roman Senate, creating word pictures recalling a group clad in togas, philosophizing and filibustering. That “Byrd’s Eye” view was a combination of “Ben-Hur,” “Gladiator,” and (surprisingly or not) “Animal House.”

A Cinematic Senate? Better check the spelling…it’s really a “Sinematic Senate” these days, courtesy of Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema. 

She came into the chamber with her own sense of fashion and attitude, wearing thigh-high boots like Jane Fonda’s “Barbarella,” employing a persona akin to Sigourney Weaver in “Alien,” and most recently, enacting a controversial high-finance provision that would warm the cold, calculating heart of Michael Douglas as Gordon Gekko in “Wall Street.”

Kyrsten named a price for supporting Joe Biden’s inaccurately named “Inflation Reduction Act,” insisting on lower taxes—not for everyday Americans, but for the rich and famous.

“Sinema took Wall Street money while killing tax on investors,” read the headline from the Aug. 13 article written by the AP’s Brian Slodysko. 

Prospective opponents read it as a real opportunity—including possible opponents from within Sinema’s own party.

While the Washington Press Corps is excessively accommodating to Democrats, most political reporters are somewhat befuddled by Arizona’s senior senator and the mega dollars stuffed into her political war chest by hedge fund managers and their ultra-wealthy associates.

Of course, what Washington might collectively regard as Kyrsten’s “LBJ Moment” isn’t a good look for her at all in Arizona.

What’s good for Wall Street is not necessarily good for Main Street or for your street…and it is absolutely objectionable on most streets in Flagstaff, Tempe and Tucson. 

But it isn’t just the indoctrinated-as-opposed-to-educated from our state supported universities who take umbrage; concern is also found among those from the “school of hard-knocks,” who have invested their own sweat equity in “bootstrap” businesses and “mom-and-pop” enterprises, only to see a Sinema-sponsored provision eliminate a proposed “carried interest” tax increase on well-heeled and passive private equity investors. 

So the high-finance crowd will enjoy a $35 billion exemption that won’t exempt other corporations – or several small businesses.

The AP article invites Arizonans of every political stripe to connect the dots” 

“Sinema has long aligned herself with the interests of private equity, hedge funds and venture capital, helping her net at least $1.5 million in campaign contributions since she was elected to the House a decade ago. But the $983,000 she has collected since last summer more than doubled what the industry donated to her during all of her preceding years in Congress combined.”

Sinema is comfortable collecting all that cash, because she considers it a “wise investment” that will help her stay in the Senate. Besides, the Democrat Leadership there won’t desert her in the event of an intraparty challenge back home.

Talk is cheap…mounting a successful challenge to an incumbent Senator isn’t.

Right now there’s a lot of chatter surrounding Rep. Ruben Gallego but when push comes to shove, will Gallego give up a safe seat in the House for a high-risk Senate run?


Sinema will face a strong Republican challenge in 2024, but over the next two years, she will try to embody the predictable title of yet another Hollywood production: “The Sure Thing.”

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.